Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Allen v. Bellendir et al
as 5:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Gavin Edward Allen
Defendant:
Brian Bellendir, Alexandria Mason, Richard Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, WellPath, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections and Well Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Long et al
as 4:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Defendant:
Brandon Long, Kyle Dodson and Jessica Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Allen v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-55712
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, W. L. MONTGOMERY, Acting Warden, MARTINEZ, Food Manager and others
ALLEN v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE et al
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE, FAYETTE COUNTY OF INDIANA and FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2021cv03151
Plaintiff:
Edward Allen
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, Warden of CTCF and Crain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Stange
as 1:2021cv00114
Petitioner:
Edward Allen Moore
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allen v. Diaz et al
as 3:2021cv01188
Defendant:
Travis, Ralph Diaz, Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Allen v. Diaz et al
as 3:2021cv00602
Defendant:
Travis, Ralph Diaz, Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
