Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Edward Buck v. United States of America
as 2:2026cv00496
Petitioner:
Edward Buck
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Edward Buck et al
as 2:2024cv01989
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Edward Buck, Latisha Nixon, Joyce Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Tsitouris v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2023cv08003
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Tsitouris
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Brandie Diane Buck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
USA v. Edward Buck
as 22-50136
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD BUCK
USA v. Edward Buck
as 22-50091
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD BUCK
Edward Buck v. Michael Carvajal, et al
as 2:2020cv07475
Plaintiff:
Edward Buck
Defendant:
Wilson, Carlos Peterson, H. Tellez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latisha Nixon et al v. Edward Buck et al
as 2:2019cv04610
Defendant:
Jackie Lacey, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (erroneously sued as "Los Angeles County", Los Angeles County and others
Plaintiff:
GEMMEL MOORE and LATISHA NIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis et al v. Valsamis, Inc.
as 1:2016cv20517
Defendant:
Valsamis, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mayberry , Diane Tucker , Ana Santa Ana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Duane Buck v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-70030
Petitioner - Appellant:
DUANE EDWARD BUCK
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Davis et al v. Valsamis, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00038
Defendant:
Valsamis, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leslie Mayberry , Diane Tucker , Ana Santa Ana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
