Cases 11 - 20 of 21
HARVEY v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HARVEY
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and OFFICE OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dell Carter v. Rayford Ervin
as 14-7062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELL LAYFETTE CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYFORD ERVIN, Clover Police Dept., FRANK SADLER, Clover Police Dept., GARY LOVE, Clover Police Dept. and others
Carter v. Ervin et al
as 0:2014cv00865
Plaintiff:
Dell Layfette Carter
Defendant:
Rayford Ervin, Frank Sadler, Gary Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVEY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04693
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HARVEY
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INC. , OHIO CASUALTY CORPORATION and THE NETHERLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Edward Harvey v. County of Navajo, et al
as 12-16883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD HARVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF NAVAJO, K. C. CLARK, individually, and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Navajo County, Arizona, BRENA CLARK and others
Harvey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Edward Harvey
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Edward Harvey v. USDC-CASF
as 10-73129
:
In re: EDWARD HARVEY
Petitioner:
EDWARD HARVEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harvey v. Navajo County, et al.
as 3:2010cv08025
Plaintiff:
Edward Harvey
Defendant:
Navajo County , K C Clark , Brenda Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahon et al v. Continental Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv03002
Plaintiff:
Sean McMahon, Sean McMahon and Sean McMahon
Defendant:
Continental Express, Inc., Celadon Group, Inc., Gilbraltar National Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
