Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Richardson v. Elrod et al
as 1:2014cv10760
Plaintiff:
James A. Richardson
Defendant:
Bruce Elrod, Chris Elrod, Cashbox Magazine and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Serfass v. Chapman et al
as 4:2014cv10019
Plaintiff:
Erik Gary Serfass
Defendant:
James Thomas Chapman, Blanca Ines Goldszmidt, Edward Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al
as 1:2013cv09195
Plaintiff:
John Price, Paul Innocenzi, IV, Mark Wigglesworth and others
Defendant:
Banca UBAE SpA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Dubose v. Wynne et al
as 5:2013cv01721
Plaintiff:
Edward Russell Dubose
Defendant:
William W. Wynne, Jr., Cliff Walker, Robert P Longshore and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:13-dp-21035
Plaintiff:
Edward Russell Gaines, III
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Gaines v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21035
Plaintiff:
Edward Russell Gaines, III
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
US v. Lonnie Russell
as 11-4328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
LONNIE EDWARD RUSSELL
US v. Lonnie Russell
as 09-4887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
LONNIE EDWARD RUSSELL
Rose v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04174
Plaintiff:
Clifford Rose
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. and Brian Edward Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
