Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Winters et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Edward Winters and Criselda Winters
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Winters
as 23-60487
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jessie Edward Winters
Lopez v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Angela Lopez
Defendant:
zurich american insurance company, Donald Edward Winters and Tina Winters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
SPEROW v. BERKS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2020cv01495
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TIMOTHY MOORE, EDWARD WINTERS and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE SPEROW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges et al v. Jayco Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
Sandra B. Bridges , Frederick Bridges , Tracey Davison and others
Defendant:
Jayco Enterprises, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridges et al v. Jayco Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00569
Plaintiff:
Sandra B. Bridges , Frederick Bridges , Tracey Davison and others
Defendant:
Jayco Enterprises, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv12438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WINTERS et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv92383
Plaintiff:
EDWARD WINTERS, EDWARD WINTERS, LUELLA WINTERS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Toure et al v. Dakin et al
as 1:2007cv11150
Plaintiff:
Desean Toure and Christine Gammons
Defendant:
Paul Dakin, Thomas G. Ambrosino, Edward Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
