Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HARRIS v. ELI LILLY PHARMACEUTICALS
as 2:2022cv03460
Plaintiff:
JAMILLAH HARRIS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY PHARMACEUTICALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Felicia Lightfoot v. Eli Lilly Pharmaceutical Comp, et al
as 17-5801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELICIA LIGHTFOOT
Defendant - Appellee:
ELI LILLY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY and NEOSAN PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
Lightfoot v. ELI LILLY Pharmaceutical Company et al
as 5:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Felicia Lightfoot
Defendant:
ELI LILLY Pharmaceutical Company and NeoSan Pharmaceutical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Veterans Administration et al
as 2:2017cv10305
Plaintiff:
Melinda Martinez
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, Denna White, Denise M. Hudson and others
Pickaree v. Eli Lilly Pharmaceuatal Company
as 4:2014mc02784
Petitioner:
Marilyn Ruth Pickaree
Respondent:
Eli Lilly Pharmaceutal Company
Dagliano v. Lilly
as 12-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Scott Dagliano
Defendant - Appellee:
Eli Lilly, Pharmaceutical Drug Company
v. Matovu et al
as 6:2009cv03390
Plaintiff:
Paul Matovu
Defendant:
Eli Lilly Pharmaceutical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Bandak v. Eli Lilly and Company Retirem, et al
as 09-2271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN I. BANDAK
Defendant - Appellee:
ELI LILLY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY and EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
Stephen Bandak v. Eli Lilly, et al
as 09-1620
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEPHEN I. BANDAK
Defendant - Appellant:
ELI LILLY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY and EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
Jefferson v. Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough et al
as 2:2009cv02096
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough, Eli Lilly Pharmaceutical Co and Garretson Law Firm, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
