Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Acosta-Ramirez et al v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2013cv01774
Plaintiff:
Eladio Acosta-Ramirez , Victor A Alvarez-Valentin , Luis M Albino-Irizarry and others
Defendant:
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Intervenor_defendant:
FDIC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Rivera v. Colvin
as 7:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kristi Elizabeth Rivera
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Rivera et al v. Carmel Central School District et al
as 7:2013cv04459
Plaintiff:
Neftali Rivera and Elizabeth Rivera
Defendant:
Carmel Central School District and Karen Baryshyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rivera v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv11409
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rivera
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIVERA v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2013cv02134
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH RIVERA
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thomas McCarthy, et al v. City of Tacoma
as 13-35183
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS MCCARTHY, PHAN NGUYEN and ELIZABETH RIVERA GOLDSTEIN
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF TACOMA
Thomas McCarthy, et al v. City of Tacoma
as 13-35129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MCCARTHY, PHAN NGUYEN and ELIZABETH RIVERA GOLDSTEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TACOMA
Rivera-Vega v. Fresh Express, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02246
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rivera-Vega
Defendant:
Fresh Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2011cv01788
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
