Cases 11 - 20 of 270
Ybarra-Johnson et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Sara Ybarra-Johnson, Karla Johnson and Erica Johnson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Economic Security, Rhonda Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Aliens: Refusal of Citizenship
Mosbah et al v. Mueller et al
as 3:2009cv03337
Plaintiff:
Ed Mosbah and Lynn Mari
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, III, Emilio Gonzales, Johnathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BARBOUR v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009cv03062
Plaintiff:
NASSER BARBOUR
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ujjin v. Mukasey et al
as 4:2009cv00038
Plaintiff:
Worlawut Ujjin
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
