Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wang v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Lishan Wang
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Ned Lamont, Reis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmi v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv03134
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Emmi
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Dean (I) Williams, Tricia Vandermark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Backusy v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv02913
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Emmy Backusy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davidson et al v. Emmis et al
as 4:2016cv00099
Plaintiff:
Gerald Alton Davidson
Defendant:
S. Emmis, T. Jefferson, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClam v. Jefferson et al
as 1:2015cv03055
Plaintiff:
Leo McClam
Defendant:
Emmie Jefferson, NFN Cross, Monique Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruach v. Byran et al
as 0:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Pouch P. Ruach
Defendant:
Geoff Byran, Emmy Seidling, B. Ells and others
Edward Raifsnider v. USA
as 11-6289
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD RAIFSNIDER, aka Scott Emmy, aka Rick Williams, aka Shawn Perkins
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Riches v. 62nd Annual Emmy Awards et al
as 1:2010cv02117
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
62nd Annual Emmy Awards, Amy Poehler, Will Arnett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steven Shanklin v. United States of America, et al
as 10-50125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DALE SHANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. FERNALD, Special Agent IRS-CID, MCKINNIES, Agent, Special Agent in Charge IRS-CID, HARLAN CARTER, Special Agent in Charge and others
Shanklin v. USA, et al
as 08-50674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DALE SHANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. FERNALD, Special Agent IRS-CID, MCKINNIES, Special Agent in Charge IRS-CID, JOHN DOE #1, Agent Carter's Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
