Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Nanney v. Hurst et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Eric Scott Nanney
Defendant:
Emma Hurst, Caroline Moyers, 32nd Division Circuit Court of Bollinger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Holliday v. Statebridge Company, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10534
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Holliday, Jr.
Defendant:
Statebridge Company, LLC and Orlans, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Scott v. Harbeck
as 1:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eric Scott
Defendant:
Dorothy Ann Harbeck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
SCOTT v. HENDRIX
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
ERIC SCOTT
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Johnston
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Scottsdale, City of, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv10282
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Berry
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Aaron Lewber, Bryan Borowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brunner v. Buchanan et al
as 8:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Brunner
Defendant:
Vern Buchanan, Sarasota County Clerk, Florida Disbursement Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thackston v. Mauldin et al
as 3:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Marlon Thackston
Defendant:
Eric Scott Mauldin, David Allen Doyle and Dee Gayle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03858
Plaintiff:
ERIC SCOTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
