Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dean et al v. Motive Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2026cv07675
Plaintiff:
Adam Dean and Christian Erickson
Defendant:
Motive Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
Antonio McGraw-Williams v. Justin Erickson, et al
as 26-2464
Petitioner:
Antonio Trevyll McGraw-Williams
Respondent:
Justin Erickson, Bemidji Police Department, Matthew D. Forbes, DOJ - USAO and Administrative, Sherburne County Jail
ERICKSON v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.
as 1:2026cv24711
Plaintiff:
SANDRA ERICKSON
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD. d/b/a ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Grappell et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv24545
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Grappell and King Leon Grappell
Defendant:
United States of America, Jana Erickson and Sonia Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Erickson v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 2:2026cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jason Erickson
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mitchell Sanderson v. Pam Nesvig, et al
as 26-2306
Plaintiff:
Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant:
Pam Nesvig, Chair, North Dakota Judicial Conduct Commission, Lawrence King, Vice Chair, Michael Hurly and others
Lamas v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2026cv05473
Plaintiff:
Erich S. Lamas
Defendant:
Markus Hopkins, Steven Witt, Matt McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Erickson v. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv03450
Plaintiff:
Chrystal Dawn Erickson
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
