Cases 41 - 50 of 80
ERTEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29189
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ERTEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe v. Mr. Ertel et al
as 5:2020cv00279
Defendant:
Mr. Ertel, Mr. Strasser, Mr. Waller and others
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Mr. Ertel et al
as 6:2020cv01055
Defendant:
Mr. Ertel, Mr. Strasser, Mr. Waller and others
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giles v. Bayview Loan Servicing, L.L.C., et al
as 2:2020cv01128
Defendant:
Corporation Servicing Company, Bayview Loan Servicing, L.L.C., The Prentice-Hall Corporation System, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Giles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newcomb v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2019cv01205
Defendant:
D Rish, C Bailey, N Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Dean Newcomb, Jr
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butcher v. David Ertel, et al
as 4:2019cv00755
Defendant:
David Ertel, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and Richard Thomas O'Brien
Plaintiff:
Blessing Nnedinma Butcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rubin v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv01377
Defendant:
Karen Ertel, State of Oregon, Mark Kleyna and others
Plaintiff:
Tamara Elise Rubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ray v. Cheatham et al
as 5:2019cv00297
Defendant:
FNU Dunbar, R.C. Cheatham, FNU Ertel and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Darrell Ray, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ertel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv01003
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sherry Ertel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Cheatham et al
as 5:2019cv00205
Defendant:
FNU Dunbar, FNU Wilson, R.C. Cheatham and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
