Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ducker et al v. TRAVELERS HOME & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv01909
Plaintiff:
Ervin Smith and Lisa Ducker
Defendant:
TRAVELERS HOME & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
ERVIN SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. McCain
as 2:2018cv11589
Plaintiff:
Ervin Smith
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
W. S. McCain and Sandy McCain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jefferson et al v. Per Mar Security Services et al
as 3:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jacob Jefferson , Rhonda Buick , Mike Richards and others
Defendant:
Per Mar Security Services, Michael Duffy, Steven Sabatke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Johnson v. Manning et al
as 6:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ronell Johnson
Defendant:
Tammy Manning, Ervin Smith and Fincher James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ervin Smith v. Phillips 66 Co., et al.
as MSS/1:08-CV-01219
Plaintiff:
Ervin Smith
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Co
Ervin & Smith Advertising et al v. Ervin et al
as 8:2008cv00459
Plaintiff:
Ervin & Smith Advertising, Ervin & Smith Advertising, Public Relations, Inc. and others
Defendant:
William Ervin, Thomas Ervin, Lynnette Roxburgh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Julian #144888 et al v. Granholm et al
as 2:2007cv00214
Plaintiff:
Eddie Armail Julian #144888, Ervin Smith-El #291281, Bahaa Shakir Kalasho #181993 and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm, Michael A. Cox and Patricia Caruso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
