Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harkless v. Yates
as 5:2020cv03313
Plaintiff:
Everett Ray Harkless
Defendant:
(fnu) Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harkless v. Saline County Jail et al
as 5:2020cv03281
Defendant:
Laney Dunn, Lee Ann Clark, Saline County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Everett Ray Harkless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2020cv00289
Defendant:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff:
EVERETT RAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cotney v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00233
Plaintiff:
Everett Ray Cotney, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hurst v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2017cv01792
Plaintiff:
Everett Ray Hurst
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv03176
Plaintiff:
Everett Ray
Defendant:
Marshall Johnson and Joshua A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carnes et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv02926
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Plaintiff:
Nedra Elaine Carnes and Everett Ray Carnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harkless v. Jackson Louisina Forinisac State Hospital of Louisina
as 3:2014cv00373
Plaintiff:
Everette Ray Harkless
Defendant:
Jackson Louisina Forinisac State Hospital of Louisina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harkless v. Jackson Louisiana Forinsac State Hospital of Louisiana
as 2:2014cv01089
Plaintiff:
Everette Ray Harkless
Defendant:
Jackson Louisiana Forinsac State Hospital of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starnes et al v. Averitt Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Michele Rene Starnes and Everett Ray Starnes
Defendant:
Averitt Express, Inc. and Unknown Driver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
