Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dequita Burks v. Lewis Eiseman, et al
as 22-1183
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEQUITA BURKS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Rodriguez Burks, Deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
LEWIS EISEMAN, Corrections Officer, DONALD PEER, Corrections Officer, GREGORY EXELBY, Corrections Officer and others
Burks v. Bauman et al
as 2:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
Dequita Burks
Defendant:
Catherine S. Bauman, Robert Wickstrom, Dean Potilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto et al v. Sky Union, LLC
as 1:2015cv04768
Plaintiff:
Christine Exelby, Jose Soto and Tanner Eastman
Defendant:
Sky Union, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berryman et al v. Freed et al
as 2:2014cv12593
Plaintiff:
Philip Berryman, Charles J Starling and Daniel Mora
Defendant:
Scott Freed, R Vittitow, L Elkins and others
Willie Goldsmith v. Unknown Sharrett, et al
as 13-1410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE EARL GOLDSMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN SHARRETT, named as John Doe Sharett - Guard, LINDA MAKI, Hearing Officer, PEGGY ANN CARBERRY, Unit Case Manager and others
Exelby et al v. Land Title Company et al
as 2:2013cv00575
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Exelby and Karmella L. Exelby
Defendant:
Land Title Company , JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Goldsmith #131338 v. Sharrett et al
as 2:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Willie Earl Goldsmith #131338
Defendant:
Unknown Sharrett, Linda Maki, Peggy Ann Carberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #464914 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2010cv00675
Plaintiff:
Terence Johnson #464914
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of Corrections, Jennifer Granholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Exelby v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2010cv00862
Plaintiff:
Willhellmina Exelby
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
