Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dwayne Cropper v. Philip Parker, et al
as 26-2592
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE CROPPER
Defendant:
PHILIP D. PARKER, in their individual capacity, FRANCHOT WALLACE, in their individual capacity and ROBERT MOCK, in their individual capacity
MOCK v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv03812
Plaintiff:
TAMI MOCK
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kelly et al v. Montgomery Housing Authority et al
as 2:2026cv00253
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly and Annette B. Kelly
Defendant:
Montgomery Housing Authority, Monica Whiting, Glynis Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinton et al v. Cochise, County of et al
as 4:2026cv00152
Plaintiff:
Marcus Hinton and Vanessa Hinton
Defendant:
Cochise, County of, Unknown Party, Mark Dannels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mock v. Sipe et al
as 1:2026cv00119
Plaintiff:
Michael Jeffery Mock
Defendant:
Timothy Sipe, Chip Swindell, Daniel Sheperd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mock v. Conrad et al
as 1:2026cv00106
Defendant:
Samuel Conrad, Colin Maisonneuve, Alexis Ochoa and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jeffery Mock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mock v. Gaskill et al
as 1:2026cv00104
Defendant:
Hillary Gaskill, Kevin Gerber and Alex Will
Plaintiff:
Michael Jeffery Mock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
