Cases 1 - 10 of 100
AMYOT et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2026cv02806
Plaintiff:
EDWARD AMYOT, LARRY BROCK, JR., MICHAEL DAUGHTRY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dessources v. Salgado et al
as 6:2026cv01716
Defendant:
Lennon Tatum, Brandon Salgado, Juan Canales Salgado and others
Plaintiff:
Rubens Dessources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinton, et al. v. County of Cochise, et al.
as 26-5028
Plaintiff:
MARCUS HINTON, VANESSA HINTON, VERONICA HINTON and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COCHISE, COCHISE COUNTY SHERIFF, DONI MAERS and others
Mock v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2026cv03216
Plaintiff:
Donald Mock
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Allstar Fire Equipment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mock v. Lewis et al
as 5:2026ct03227
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Mock
Defendant:
C/O Lewis, C/O Greene and C/O Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwayne Cropper v. Philip Parker, et al
as 26-2592
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE CROPPER
Defendant:
PHILIP D. PARKER, in their individual capacity, FRANCHOT WALLACE, in their individual capacity and ROBERT MOCK, in their individual capacity
MOCK v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv03812
Plaintiff:
TAMI MOCK
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kelly et al v. Montgomery Housing Authority et al
as 2:2026cv00253
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly and Annette B. Kelly
Defendant:
Montgomery Housing Authority, Monica Whiting, Glynis Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
