Cases 1 - 10 of 257
US v. Arthur Jones
as 24-6462
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
In re: Arthur Jones
as 24-1351
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Jones v. Richmond County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Christopher F. Jones
Defendant:
Richmond County Sheriff Department and Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jones, et al
as 23-5112
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RYAN K. JONES and TARAH F. JONES
Edmond v. Winstead PC Law et al
as 3:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Rashawn Edmond, Derrick Edmond, Jordyn Phenice Edmond and others
Defendant:
Winstead PC Law, Experiant, Bellrock Real Estate Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In re: Arthur Jones
as 23-2226
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Jones v. Money Market Savings Account #2935 et al
as 1:2023cv02430
Plaintiff:
Danny F. Jones
Defendant:
Money Market Savings Account #2935 and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Murry et al v. Serafino et al
as 4:2023cv00683
Defendant:
Aimbridge Hospitality, Waddell Serafino, Dallas Child Support Division Office and others
Plaintiff:
Reverend James Murry, Lakeshia Rashawn Edmond, Jordyn Phenice Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Jones et al
as 6:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Margaret Jones
Defendant:
Brenda F. Jones, Helen L. Jones, Linda K. Jones and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
