Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Alkassar (PS) v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 1:2026cv04262
Plaintiff:
Monzer Alkassar and Abu Monawar
Defendant:
F.B.O.P., Counter Terrorism Unit, Christian Lepe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarmarco Moore v. J. Wadas, et al
as 26-2115
Petitioner:
JARMARCO O. MOORE
Respondent:
J. WADAS, Warden and W. MARSHALL, F.B.O.P. Director
Roper v. DOJ et al
as 1:2025cv01744
Plaintiff:
Gene Curtis Roper
Defendant:
DOJ, FBOP, FCI Talladega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roper v. DOJ et al
as 2:2025cv00142
Plaintiff:
Gene Curtis Roper
Defendant:
DOJ, F.B.O.P., F.C.I. Talladega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Antonelli et al
as 5:2025cv00483
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Thomas
Defendant:
Warden B.M. Antonelli, Nurse Chisty Mattews, Head Nurse Michael Breman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sanchez v. F.B.O.P.
as 5:2025hc02112
Petitioner:
John G. Sanchez
Respondent:
F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martin v. F.B.O.P Employees
as 1:2025cv00162
Plaintiff:
Joshua Martin
Defendant:
F.B.O.P Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaber v. McCoy, M.D. et al
as 5:2024cv00152
Defendant:
F.B.O.P. Office of General Counsel, Washington, D.C. and Emery McCoy, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Jaber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Cauthen, III et al
as 4:2024cv03667
Defendant:
E. Jean Howard, FBOP Director Collette Peters, Maxwell Barnes Cauthen, III and others
Plaintiff:
Mark B. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Robert Decker v. USA, et al
as 24-2067
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, Director of F.B.O.P. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
