Cases 1 - 10 of 337
Aguon v. Hazelton F.C.I. Warden et al
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Robert L. Aguon
Respondent:
Hazelton F.C.I. Warden, S.I.S. and The O.I.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Love v. Flowers et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
Brandon S. Flowers A.U.S.A., F.C.I Hazelton Warden Rey, F.C.I. Hazelton S.I.S. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Andrews v. F.C.I. Schuylkill et al
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Andrews, III
Defendant:
F.C.I. Schuylkill and Warden Beth Rickard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damron v. F.C.I Hazelton's Warden
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Jon Damron
Respondent:
F.C.I Hazelton's Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CLINKENBEARD v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH DALE CLINKENBEARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, PHARMACY OF F.C.I. TERRE HAUTE and JAMIE AUTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(HC) Hernandez-Velasquez v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
as 1:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Jeison Hernandez-Velasquez
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hill v. Government for the State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Eric Rodney Hill
Defendant:
Government for the State of West Virginia, F.C.I. Hazelton and Warden Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Cruz-Garcia v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
as 1:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Jose Alberto Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Taylor v. Warden, F.C.I. Edgefield
as 2:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Marquiz Sanchez Taylor
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
