Cases 51 - 60 of 6,098
Brulport v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2023cv03320
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JEAN BRULPORT and Barbara Jean Brulport, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Steven Bruce Brulport, Deceased
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Aerco International, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Keeling et al v. John Crane Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
RONALD KEELING and Lois Keeling
Defendant:
John Crane Inc., 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Parker et al v. Alfa Laval Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, BW/IP International Incorporated, Pfizer Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
David Parker and Sharon Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Salvemini et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00977
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company, Goulds Pumps LLC, Paramount Global and others
Cross Claimant:
Hess Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michele Salvemini, Francesco Salvemini, Marco Salvemini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Michael Twombly v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10236
Defendant:
Aurora Pump, Ford Motor Company, VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL and others
Cross Defendant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, Crane Co., York International Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
General Electric Company, COPES VULCAN, INC., The Budd Company and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TWOMBLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILBUR TWOMBLY and Michael Twombly
3Rd Party Defendant:
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Not Classified By Court:
Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Craig v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2022cv00462
Defendant:
Paramount Global, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Redco Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
