Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Johnson v. Ford
as 6:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Dennis Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Officer FNU Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuffey v. VanVLeck et al
as 6:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Doug McGuffey
Defendant:
Kayla VanVLeck, FNU Willson, FNU Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10704
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, MRF, FNU Montgomery and others
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Petitioner:
Antoine Jackson, DeMariol Byrd, Donte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Williamson et al
as 5:2021cv01064
Plaintiff:
Christopher Addarryl Jones and Tupac David Shakur
Defendant:
Terrance Dennis, Kelsie Williamson, FNU Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. Mesa et al
as 5:2020cv00511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Sadler and Salah Aldin Yussuf Ibn Ayyub
Defendant:
Florida Clinical Laboratories, Inc, Louis A. Vargas, FNU Hugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
