Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Tolley v. Wardlow et al
as 1:2024cv01037
Plaintiff:
Eric Tolley
Defendant:
Jerry Wardlow, FNU Harris, Jeremy Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heaven v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jerome Heaven, Jr.
Defendant:
Billy Woods, FNU Harris, FNU Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Garrido
as 23-10425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden FNU Garrido, FNU Swan, A.W., FNU McMannis, A.W. and others
Mack v. Oritz et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mack
Defendant:
FNU Oritz, FNU Bowers, U.D.C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Petty v. Garrido et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant:
Warden FNU Garrido, FNU Swan, FNU McMannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Ft Worth PD et al
as 4:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Melvin F Allen
Defendant:
Ft Worth PD, FNU Harris, Other Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03416
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
FNU Cooper, FNU Gardner, FNU Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rogers v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Petitioner:
Antoine Jackson, DeMariol Byrd, Donte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Streeter v. Harris et al
as 3:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Faith Sherrie Streeter
Defendant:
FNU Harris, FNU Rivers and FNU Guild
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Haddon, et al
as 22-4048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENT MAYON COBB
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY BENZON, Warden, Utah State Prison, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison, KENT DEMILL, Board of Pardons Chair Person and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
