Cases 71 - 80 of 140
Fontanez-Jimenez v. Oyola-Velez et al
as 3:2017cv01465
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Fontanez-Jimenez
Defendant:
FNU Gonzalez, FNU Cabanas, Migue Caban-Agosto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longoria v. Thompson et al
as 4:2017cv00011
Defendant:
David Flores, Co. III FNU Martinez, FNU Mongomery and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Soto Longoria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2017cv00028
Petitioner:
Charles Carr
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and FNU Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grimes v. Fox et al
as 5:2016cv01446
Plaintiff:
Jerome L Grimes
Defendant:
Daniel Fox, FNU Fox, Jarrell Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Doe et al
as 5:2016cv00689
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Jane Doe, FNU Terralonge, Kimberly Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobel v. Douglas County Jail, et al
as 16-3336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT HARRIS KOBEL
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS COUNTY JAIL, (FNU) BUNTING, (FNU) HAGENBUCH and others
Lyons v. Grondolsky, et al
as 16-1433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEON LORENZO LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY GRONDOLSKY, LINDA SANDERS, UNITED STATES and others
Ortiz v. Martinez et al
as 7:2016cv00078
Defendant:
Officer FNU Bell, Officer FNU Browny, Corporal FNU Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Butts v. Marcus Martin, et al
as 15-41640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL RICHARD BUTTS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCUS MARTIN, also known as FNU Martin, DERRIC WILSON, also known as FNU Wilson, CHERYL CRANMER-SUTTON, also known as FNU Cranmer and others
Thomas v. Triplett et al
as 3:2015cv00400
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
FNU Triplett, FNU Russell, FNU Holder and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
