Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Mr. FNU Honeycutt, FNU Farrish, Timothy Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Plano Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bridges
Defendant:
Plano Police Department, Plano Animal Control, Sargeant FNU Sun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Zachery et al
as 2:2021cv00364
Respondent:
FNU Shwartz, FNU Zachery, FNU Taylor and others
Petitioner:
Lenelle Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Gene RegaIn re: Robert Gene Rega
as 20-1377
Respondent:
GRIM, WILLIAM D. SPRENKLE, FNU VANDIVNER and others
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT GENE REGA
Gray v. Zachary et al
as 5:2020cv00057
Defendant:
FNU Shwartz, FNU Matthews, A.W. Clemmons and others
Plaintiff:
Lennelle Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REGA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00684
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE'S SCI COAL TOWNSHIP, SCI ALBION, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE REGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Fishinghawk v. Harbin et al
as 5:2018cv00291
Plaintiff:
Evan C Fishinghawk
Defendant:
Janice Harbin, Pat Stem, Carl Bear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Dalie v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 17-2796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE DALIE
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the PA DOC, DIANA WOODSIDE, Director of Policy and Grants (PA. DOC) and others
Lilley v. Dancy et al
as 5:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
Chester Lilley
Defendant:
Craig Dancy, Andrew Warren and FNU Matthew
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
