Cases 1 - 10 of 25
FASSBENDER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01894
Petitioner:
JAY FASSBENDER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
De La Cruz v. Maurer et al
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Roman S De La Cruz
Defendant:
Aimee Maurer, Patrick Johnson, Jeffrey R Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Evan Fassbender v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 23-2130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVAN R. FASSBENDER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, TONY EVERS, KIRSTEN JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fassbender v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Evan R Fassbender
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Tony Evers, Kirsten Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fassbender et al v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02603
Plaintiff:
Ronald Fassbender, Stacey Fassbender and Ronald J. Fassbender, Jr.
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company and United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
GRACE v. SHENK et al
as 2:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
JEFF J. GRACE
Defendant:
CHRISTINE A. SHENK, RACHEL FASSBENDER and MARY K. SMITHSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv22330
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Fassbender Jerome
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
