Cases 1 - 10 of 917
Floyd et al v. Campbell et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Ashton Michelle Floyd and Stewart Floyd
Defendant:
Christopher Campbell and Nolan Logging & Chipping, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Hunt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Columbia, City of et al
as 3:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Floyd E. Brown
Defendant:
Columbia, City of, Columbia Police Department, City of, David Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Floyd et al v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 8:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Nicole M. Floyd and Temitope Ogunwumiju
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, Nathaniel Perk, Susan Wybenga and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act - Liability
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Core Training, Inc. v. Be. Coaching and Consulting, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
The Core Training, Inc.
Defendant:
Be. Coaching and Consulting, LLC, Chad Lubben, Jane Floyd and others
Floyd Lee Locums Inc v. Brigante
as 4:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Floyd Lee Locums Inc
Defendant:
Zachary L Brigante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
John Newsome v. Reginald Floyd
as 24-6283
Plaintiff:
JOHN RICHARD NEWSOME
Defendant:
REGINALD FLOYD, K. JEFFORDS and C. SPAZIANI
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
