Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Banner Life Insurance Company v. Keyt et al
as 3:2026cv00409
Defendant:
Adam Flynn, Michael Flynn, Kimberly Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
Banner Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
David Bul v. Flynn et al
as 1:2026cv14988
Defendant:
Alilia Hollander, Luis Castello and Damien Flynn
Plaintiff:
David Bul
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Banks, Leon v. Flynn, Grace et al
as 3:2026cv01085
Defendant:
County of Milwaukee, John Dingman and Grace Flynn
Plaintiff:
Leon Jovani Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Flynn v. Castro et al
as 7:2026cv09388
Defendant:
Marcos I. Trento and Juan Castro
Plaintiff:
Duane R. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
BUL v. FLYNN et al
as 2:2026cv08224
Plaintiff:
DAVID BUL
Defendant:
DAMIEN FLYNN, LUIS CASTELLO and ALILIA HOLLANDER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Japmeet Singh Saroy v. University of San Francisco et al
as 3:2026cv12235
Plaintiff:
Japmeet Singh Saroy and Jack Saroy
Defendant:
University of San Francisco, Amy Flynn, Allison Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Flynn v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv01978
Plaintiff:
Dennis Flynn
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Graham v. Amacker, et al.
as 26-7046
Plaintiff:
SANKONA GRAHAM
Defendant:
AMANDA AMACKER, B. SILBER, ESTILL and others
Flynn v. City of Bethel et al
as 4:2026cv00043
Plaintiff:
Ariane Flynn
Defendant:
City of Bethel, Jason Cohen and Dylan Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
