Cases 1 - 10 of 31
ACOSTA v. CALDWELL CORRECTIONAL CTR.
as 1:2023cv00750
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANCISCO ACOSTA
Respondent:
CALDWELL CORRECTIONAL CTR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ACOSTA LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv22806
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO ACOSTA LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v. Obregon
as 3:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Wendy Janeth Chavez Ramos
Defendant:
Eduardo Ismael Acosta Obregon and Luis Francisco Acosta Obregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
USA v. Luis Acosta
as 21-2991
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS FRANCISCO ACOSTA REYES
Jones v. Acosta
as 1:2021cv20555
Defendant:
Warden Francisco Acosta
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West Sr v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv20104
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Warden Francisco Acosta, Sgt. Green and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon West Sr and Derrick Devon West, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ham v. Inch et al
as 9:2020cv81071
Defendant:
Francisco Acosta, Sargeant John Doe #3, SGT. Salmon and others
Plaintiff:
Ottis Lee Ham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vivian Konopasek v. Ten Associates, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv00272
Defendant:
TACTICAL SERVICES, INC., Francisco Acosta, 12 RETECH CORPORATION and others
Petitioner:
Vivian Konopaske
Plaintiff:
Vivian Konopasek
Interested Party:
Daniel Monteverde and Angelo Pnzetta
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Horvatt v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv20378
Plaintiff:
Clint Horvatt
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Francisco Acosta, Alazo Horner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Eazy OZ Bailbonds et al
as 0:2018cv60103
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Eazy OZ Bailbonds, Outdere Entertainment, Christopher Henry Cosby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
