Cases 1 - 10 of 18
United States of America v. Rodriguez
as 22-1342
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hipolito Rodriguez, Ygnacio Fernandez, AKA Eddie Melenita, AKA Eddie Fernandez, AKA Francisco Rosario, AKA Roberto Perez, Pedro Santana, AKA Pupi and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Segundo Batista
United States of America v. Rosario-Galarza et al
as 3:2020cv01608
Defendant:
Conjugal Partnership Rosario-Rodriguez, Lydia Rodriguez-Baez and Francisco Rosario-Galarza
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rosario Henriquez v. Lynch
as 16-3475
Petitioner:
Francisco Antonio Rosario Henriquez, AKA Francisco Rosario
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney General
Rosario v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Rey Francisco Rosario
Defendant:
Luther Strange and Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Houston County
as 1:2015cv00050
Petitioner:
Rey Francisco Rosario
Respondent:
Houston County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSARIO v. FIERRO et al
as 2:2013cv03865
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO ROSARIO
Defendant:
HUGO FIERRO, CITY OF NEWARK , NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bronner v. Rosario et al
as 1:2013cv04331
Interpleader_plaintiff:
Leonard Eli Bronner
Interpleader_defendant:
Francisco Rosario, 5b Capital Group, L.L.C., WIC Jersey, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
ROSARIO et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv40091
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO ROSARIO and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Rosario v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv00314
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rosario
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROSARIO et al v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORR. FAC
as 2:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO ROSARIO
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORR. FAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
