Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sanchez v. Quay
as 1:2022cv00275
Petitioner:
Freddie Sanchez
Respondent:
Herman Quay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Freddie Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Aleman-Valdivia et al v. Top Dog Plumbing & Heating Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00421
Defendant:
Ron Maimon Azulai, Top Dog Plumbing & Heating Corp., First Choice PL, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Freddy Sanchez and Michael Aleman-Valdivia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Sanchez-Martinez
as 20-1007
Defendant / Appellant:
FREDDIE SANCHEZ-MARTINEZ, a/k/a Casco
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Hogue et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12052
Plaintiff:
Marc Resch, Michelle Morgan Bundock, Alicia Munoz and others
Defendant:
Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina and Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
United States of America v $42,000 in United States Currency
as 1:2015cv11508
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$42,000 in United States Currency and $8,000 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Freddy Sanchez and Richard Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sanchez v. Brown et al
as 2:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
Freddie Sanchez
Defendant:
Toni Brown and Robin Syler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
