Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Doe v. Jones et al
as 1:2026cv12630
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Frederick Jones, Windale Developers, Inc., Arnold C Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv01845
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK Jones
Defendant:
ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
JONES v. ARMALY BRANDS
as 2:2025cv01332
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK JONES
Defendant:
ARMALY BRANDS
Pretrial Service:
Loriann E Fuhrer
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
(HC)Jones v. Jones
as 1:2025cv00908
Petitioner:
Frederick Jones
Respondent:
Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
K., et al. v. County of Sonoma, et al.
as 25-4559
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN K., MICHELLE K., KAYA K. and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SONOMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JOSEPHINE MCCAY and others
JONES v. JONES
as 1:2025cv02311
Petitioner:
FREDERICK JONES
Respondent:
FREDERICK JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Latonya Honorable and Arkansas Insurance Department
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv00436
Defendant:
Krisit Putman, United States Postal Service, Arkansas Department of Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
P.C. and M.C.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
as 3:2023cv02829
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jones
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
