Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fredrickson v. Caldwell et al
as 1:2026cv01350
Plaintiff:
Lisa Fredrickson
Counter-Defendant:
Daniel James Caldwell, I, Jennifer Zimmerman, Melinda Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Radke v. Paxton Park District et al
as 2:2026cv02145
Plaintiff:
Ross Blake Radke
Defendant:
Paxton Park District, Matthew T Quinlan, Hannah Meents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Page, Emmanuel v. Hannah, Karen et al
as 3:2026cv00394
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Page
Defendant:
Karen Hannah, Denise Valerius, Sarah Lerczak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrickson v. Stryker Corporation
as 1:2026cv00878
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fredrickson, Stacy Trepanier and Belva Thompson
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Fredrickson v. Warden
as 26-10175
Petitioner:
Timothy Fredrickson
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Seagoville
Meinke v. Fredrickson et al
as 2:2026cv00385
Plaintiff:
Lacey Meinke
Defendant:
Fredrickson, Jackson, Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrickson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv01593
Plaintiff:
Pamela Fredrickson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Elden v. Fredrickson, et al.
as 25-6984
Plaintiff:
SPENCER ELDEN
Defendant:
NIRVANA, LLC, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., THE DAVID GEFFEN COMPANY and others
Movant:
TIMOTHY FREDRICKSON, Proposed Intervenor-Defendant
USA v. Timothy Fredrickson
as 25-2876
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TIMOTHY B. FREDRICKSON
Fredrickson v. Warden of Seagoville
as 4:2025cv01051
Petitioner:
Timothy Fredrickson
Respondent:
Warden of Seagoville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
