Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Bailey v. Einerson et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson Bailey
Defendant:
Carol Lynnie Einerson, Michael Zener, Mary LeFavre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
Stith v. Townsend et al
as 3:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Raquel Stith
Defendant:
Wesley Townsend and J.D. Fulk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00298
Defendant:
Chris Tinsley, Derick Choice, Nancy Perryman and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Botie Hillhouse, Unidentified Deputies, Tony Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hillhouse et al
as 6:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Botie Hillhouse, Unidentified Deputies, Nancy Perryman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. Aki et al
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Troy C. McKenzie
Defendant:
Keith Aki, Sidney Wood, Carol L. Einerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Chadrick Fulks
as 23-2
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS
Chadrick Fulks v. T. Watson, et al
as 22-3308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADRICK FULKS
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden, WILLIAM WILSON, Doctor, LIEUTENANT SHERMAN and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fulk v. USA
as 1:2022cv00195
Petitioner:
Chad M Fulk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
