Cases 1 - 10 of 100
COHEN SEGLIAS PALLAS GREENHALL & FURMAN PC v. THE REPUBLIC OF SIERRA LEONE
as 1:2026cv03900
Defendant:
THE REPUBLIC OF SIERRA LEONE
Plaintiff:
COHEN SEGLIAS PALLAS GREENHALL & FURMAN PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
OSBORNE v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2026cv08243
Petitioner:
FURMAN OSBORNE
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FURMAN v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv05205
Plaintiff:
DELORES FURMAN
Defendant:
PFIZER INC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Furman #760006 v. McCauley et al
as 1:2026cv02629
Plaintiff:
Dajuan Furman #760006
Defendant:
Unknown McCauley, Sandra Jones, Unknown Hadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furman Ford v. Kiernan Whitworth
as 26-6970
Plaintiff:
FURMAN ALEXANDER FORD
Defendant:
KIERNAN WHITWORTH and ETHAN ONTJES
Anibaldi et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01052
Plaintiff:
Eric Anibaldi, Mohammad Arju, Alexander Backes and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ford v. United States of America
as 5:2026ct03249
Plaintiff:
Furman Alexander Ford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Avery v. Washko et al
as 2:2026cv12468
Plaintiff:
Torre Otis Avery
Defendant:
Charles Washko, Matthew Furman, Crystal Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Furman v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv00800
Plaintiff:
Daniel Furman
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
