Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gumbs et al v. The City of New Haven et al
as 3:2026cv00672
Plaintiff:
Aquarius Gumbs, Korissa Roan and D.R.
Defendant:
The City of New Haven, John Doe, Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ross v. City of New Rochelle et al
as 1:2026cv01442
Plaintiff:
Percell L. Ross
Defendant:
City of New Rochelle, Westchester County, New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haynes et al v. Aimbridge Hospitality, LLC
as 1:2026cv01579
Plaintiff:
Albert Haynes and Michael Cogan
Defendant:
Aimbridge Hospitality, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv02655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
RECTOR v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2025cv02379
Plaintiff:
COGAN RECTOR
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Celli v. Lehrburger
as 25-2517
Petitioner:
LUCIO CELLI
Respondent:
Judge ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, NEW YORK CITY, NYC DOE, TRS, EEOC, MICHAEL MULGREW, Union Federation of Teachers and others
Celli v. Lehrburger
as 25-2300
Petitioner:
LUCIO CELLI
Respondent:
Judge ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, NEW YORK CITY, NYC DOE, TRS, EEOC, MICHAEL MULGREW, Union Federation of Teachers and others
Alvarez et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11931
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corp Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rene Alvarez, David Barreto, Denise Beavers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
