Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TUCKER v. JONES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01713
Defendant: SANDLING SPEEDING, L PRESCOTT, GILEND SAENCES INC and others
Plaintiff: WAYNE WILLIAM TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIRSCHKORN v. BRANNON et al
as 5:2019cv00149
Plaintiff: JEFFREY R HIRSCHKORN
Defendant: JACK TROMBLEY, MARK INCH, G HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. JONES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00280
Plaintiff: WAYNE WILLIAM TUCKER
Defendant: JULIE L JONES, RICK SCOTT, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv04499
Plaintiff: Walter G. Hancock
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grimes v. Hancock
as 1:2014cv03269
Plaintiff: Charles E. Grimes
Defendant: Richard G. Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hancock v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv12697
Plaintiff: Eva G. Hancock
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hancock v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as WVS/2:13-cv-12697
Plaintiff: Eva G. Hancock
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc.
HANCOCK v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00654
Plaintiff: PATRICIA G. HANCOCK
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2010cv01367
Defendant: ROBERT HANCOCK, THELMA G. HANCOCK and TERRY G. ROE
Plaintiff: STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Type: Contract Insurance
HANCOCK v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00087
Plaintiff: SHEILA G. HANCOCK
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?