Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Cassidy v. New York State Insurance Fund
as 23-496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Craig Cassidy
Defendant / Appellee:
New York State Insurance Fund, New York State Workers' Compensation Board, Honorable Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Chevron Store 209084
as 2:2022cv01353
Plaintiff:
Billy G Williams
Defendant:
Chevron Store 209084
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WEEMS v. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv03961
Plaintiff:
MARGO A WEEMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITORS, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BRIJMOHAN v. WATSON et al
as 1:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
SEAN JEFFREY BRIJMOHAN
Defendant:
CLOVIS WATSON, JR, LINDA J STUMP-KURNICK, AARON BRAMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. City Of Spanish Fort et al.
as 1:2021cv00431
Plaintiff:
Lyndsey P. Cooper
Defendant:
City of Spanish Fort, Michael Murphy McMillan and Mary Lynn G. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassidy v. New York State Insurance Fund et al
as 8:2021cv00521
Defendant:
New York State Insurance Fund, Darlene Dorsett, Mark Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Craig Cassidy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
Willie T. Dean
Defendant:
K. Ruddy and G. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
