Cases 21 - 30 of 59
SIMS v. SAYLOR et al
as 1:2018cv03420
Defendant:
STEVEN, TIMMONS, TEMPLE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandes v. IDOC et al
as 3:2018cv01438
Defendant:
Jane Doe, C.E.C. Civigenics, Jonson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Brandes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. G.E.O. GROUP et al
as 1:2018cv02048
Plaintiff:
CALEB JONES
Defendant:
G.E.O. GROUP, TITUS, TEMPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv01685
Defendant:
G.E.O. GROUP and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Meyers v. Kellett et al
as 2:2016cv00722
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
G. Kellett, Edward Wright, D. Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rascon v. Douglas, et al
as 16-2251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RASCON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD DOUGLAS, MAUREEN BIXENMAN and LISA STABLER
Defendant:
LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, V. KEELING, G.E.O. GROUP INC. and others
Goodman v. The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility et al
as 1:2015cv01468
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodman
Defendant:
The Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility, G.E.O. Group Inc., R. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rascon v. Corizon Medical Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rascon
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Corp., Donald Douglas, Maureen Bixenman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Matthews El v. Harold Clarke
as 14-6959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR RICHARD MATTHEWS EL, a/k/a Arthur Richard Matthews, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Eastern Regional Director, RENEE WOODSON, Eastern Regional Ombudsman, Human Rights Advocate and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
