Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Burton et al v. Winn et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Logan Burton, Marc Zdrojewski, James Wright and others
Defendant:
Cody Clay Winn, Market Modern, LLC and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Brooks v. Michael A. Manuel Trucking et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Gary Brooks
Defendant:
Michael A. Manuel Trucking, Great West Casualty Company and Taylor Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Motor Vehicle
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58693
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00227
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Mary Lillian Brooks and Gary Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00061
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Brooks et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as AZ/2:17-cv-02651
Plaintiff:
Gary Brooks and Mary Lillian Brooks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Brooks et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02651
Plaintiff:
Gary Brooks and Mary Lillian Brooks
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company v. Christian Funeral Directors, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02103
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christian Funeral Directors, Inc., Joe Johnson, Clemente Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
