Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Brian Adams, et al v. 3M Company
as 23-5232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES, et al.
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Chapman v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv18588
Plaintiff:
Gary Chapman
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: 3M Company
as 22-0505
Petitioner:
In re: 3M COMPANY, fka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
Respondent:
BRIAN ADAMS, ALICE ADAMS, EDWARD ADAMS and others
Adams et al vs 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00082
Defendant:
Network Supply, 3M Company, American Optical Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Adams, Alice Adams, Edward Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08763
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joseph Henry v. County of Kerrville, et al
as 16-50623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH AARON HENRY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF KERRVILLE, KERRVILLE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, PHILIP KARASEK and others
Henry v. County of Kerrville et al
as 5:2016cv00284
Defendant:
Stephen B. Ables, Robinn Burlew, Gary Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Aaron Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Chapman v. Supplemental Benefit Retiremen, et al
as 12-1854
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GARY CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
LIN TELEVISION CORPORATION, individually and as Administrator and Fiduciary of the Supplemental Retirement Plan of LIN Television Corporation and Subsidiary Companies and SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN OF LIN TELEVISION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Chapman v. Supplemental Benefit Retiremen, et al
as 12-1779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY CHAPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN OF LIN TELEVISION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES and LIN TELEVISION CORP, individually and as Administrator and Fiduciary of the Supplemental Retirement Plan of LIN Television Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
Chapman v. Herfert
as 2:2011cv10789
Plaintiff:
Gary Chapman
Defendant:
Herfert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
