Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dauscher v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2026cv01311
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dauscher
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, Indiana Department of Correction, WESTVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. United Automobile Insurance Company, et al.
as 26-4327
Plaintiff:
GARY LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, ROGERS MASTRANGELO CARVALHO & MITCHELL, LTD. and STEPHEN ROGERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-10401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00067
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lewis v. United Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2025cv01893
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis
Defendant:
United Automobile Insurance Company, Stephen Rogers and Rogers Mastrangelo Carvalo & Mitchell, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Larrea et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv11654
Plaintiff:
Adam Larrea, Julie Larsen, Scott Larson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cross-Defendant:
Neta Link
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gary Brown v. Dexter Payne
as 25-2397
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis Brown
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (Originally named Pulaski County Circuit Court)
Keys v. Jones
as 1:2025cv00570
Petitioner:
Gary Lewis Keys
Respondent:
DeShawn Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
