Cases 1 - 10 of 323
GLUNT v. 84 LUMBER et al
as 2:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH S. GLUNT
Defendant:
84 LUMBER and ATTORNEY CRAIG SNETHEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
CULMER v. SCI - HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE LAMONT CULMER
Defendant:
SCI - HOUTZDALE, SETH DANIEL BURGGRAF, OFFICER YACKULICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Glunt v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00143
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Robert Glunt
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Boyer v. Lamos et al
as 4:2020cv02139
Defendant:
Lancaster Co PA DA Office, Superintendent Marirosa Lamos, Superintendent Mark Glunt and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Boyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ace American Insurance Company v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01347
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc. and Blackmore and Glunt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myron Moton v. Wetzel, et al
as 20-2432
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, DAVY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Michael Givens v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-3148
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON CLARK, WILLIAM WILLIAMS, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GIVENS
Myron Moton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-2773
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. SWIFT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
