Cases 31 - 40 of 3,342
Graham v. USA
as 7:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion Graham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dunn v. Pietraszkiewicz et al.
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunn
Defendant:
Officer Ann Pietraszkiewicz, Detective Gregory Williams, Officer John Marincek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Glaspie v. Flory et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant:
Craig Flory, S Sprabery, FNU Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Graham v. Abbey O'Brien, et al
as 24-1295
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
Abbey O'Brien, Unknown Probation Officer #1, Unknown Probation Officer #2 and others
Godbee v. Graham
as 2:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Burnett Godbee
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kassal v. Stromberg et al
as 1:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Brian Kassal
Defendant:
Paul Stromberg, Jason Lengerich, Troy Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Tommy James Graham, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Artrip, Thompson, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. FORRESTER et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
DESMOND LAMAR GRAHAM, JR
Defendant:
KAREN FORRESTER, EMANUAL HERNANDEZ-PEREZ and CENTURION OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Graham
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center and Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
James Martin Graham
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
