Cases 21 - 30 of 348
GALL v. DANIELS et al
as 5:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TRAVIS GALL
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DANIELS and DEPUTY WARDEN JESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gall v. Daniels et al
as 1:2022cv03436
Plaintiff:
Edward Travis Gall
Defendant:
Ms. Daniels and Ms. Jester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Klepinger et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Paris A Duncan and Paris Andre Duncan
Defendant:
Casie Klepinger, Neil Johnson and R Gall
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) and PENDLETON CIC/CIF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gall v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2022cv01614
Plaintiff:
Antonette Gall
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DOBY v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2022cv03011
Plaintiff:
DAVID DOBY
Defendant:
SGT. JOHN DOE #1, OFC. A. RODRIGUEZ, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
Tony Webster
Defendant:
. Williams, . Gall, . Gousi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble Prestige Limited v. Craig Galle, et al
as 22-11520
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NOBLE PRESTIGE LIMITED
Defendant / Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS GALLE, PAUL HORN and GALLE LAW GROUP, P.A.
James Martin v. Mike Galle, et al
as 22-1662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE GALLE, PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. and TRISTICA HOWARD
MARTIN v. GALLE et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
JAMES MARTIN
Defendant:
MIKE GALLE, PENN NATIONAL GAMING, TRISTICA HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Simmons v. Zuker et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simmons
Defendant:
Mrs. Zuker, S.E. Gall, House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
