Cases 81 - 90 of 1,372
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Willis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03068
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Willis, Thomas Cannon, Joe Bridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Garcia v. South Carolina DSS Child Support Agency
as 3:2023cv03012
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Defendant:
South Carolina DSS Child Support Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Floyd et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv02840
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory Floyd, William Paul Ernst, Larry Layne Eshleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Vilma Mejia-Garcia v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1651
Petitioner:
VILMA MERCEDES MEJIA-GARCIA, B.A.M., OSCAR ROBERTO MEJIA-MEJIA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Evelyn Garcia-Alberto v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1640
Petitioner:
EVELYN ARELY GARCIA-ALBERTO, a/k/a Evelin Arely Garcia-Alberto
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Garcia v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00424
Petitioner:
Enrique Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
