Cases 31 - 40 of 2,587
Evans v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Garry Evans
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAGGINS v. USA
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
GARRY HAGGINS, JR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP
as 2:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Garris Smith
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
The Filta Group, Inc. v. Garry et al
as 6:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
The Filta Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick Michael Garry and MMG Enterprise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
The Filta Group, Inc. v. Garry et al
as 6:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
The Filta Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick Michael Garry and MMG Enterprise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Filta Group, Inc. v. Garry et al
as 6:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
The Filta Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Patrick Michael Garry and MMG Enterprise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Gerald Hopper v. Garry McFadden
as 24-6050
Plaintiff:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Defendant:
GARRY L. MCFADDEN, Sheriff, Mecklenburg County, In his official capacity, MARY LEBLISS, Medical Doctor, Mecklenburg County Jail, in her individual capacity, DESTINY WALTERS, Physician Assistant, Mecklenburg County Jail, in her individual capacity and others
White v. Clements Unit Med Stf
as 24-10049
Plaintiff:
Garry W. White
Defendant:
Clements Unit Medical Staff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
