Cases 1 - 10 of 14,150
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Daniel v. Fighter-Daniel et al
as 2:2024cv11218
Plaintiff:
Allen David Daniel
Defendant:
Teri Fighter-Daniel, M. Sorensen, Barber and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00463
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
United States of America v. Gary
as 1:2024cv03818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Crabb v. Kulhan et al
as 4:2024cv04081
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Gary Kulhan, Carly Rhoades and Daniel Teel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullinax et al v. Griffin et al
as 0:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Trevor Mullinax and Tammy Beason
Defendant:
Michael Griffin, Daniel Taggart, Gary Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Evans v. Leblanc, et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Paris Demetrius Evans
Defendant:
Bob LeBlanc, Gary E Molek, Heather Danielle Pastoor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Worden v. Gearland et al
as 4:2024cv11191
Plaintiff:
Marc David Worden
Defendant:
Glenn Gearland, T. Blain, Gary Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. City of Rayville
as 24-30289
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Individually & in his Official Capacity, Tyler Wade, in his Individual Capacity & Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
