Cases 1 - 10 of 18
USA v. Gary Hammonds
as 23-5156
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY HAMMONDS
HAMMONDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09754
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY HAMMONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammonds v. Russell et al
as 2:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
Gary Hammonds
Defendant:
Chris Russell, Amber Carter, Tom Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01301
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Hammond
Hammond v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01301
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hammond et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02321
Plaintiff:
Christy L. Hammond and Gary Hammond
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JORDAN et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv02802
Plaintiff:
LEE ROY JORDAN , RANDY WHITE , RAYFIELD WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan et al v. National Football League
as TXS/4:12-cv-01296
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Jordan , Randy White , Rayfield Wright and others
Defendant:
The National Football League
Jordan et al v. National Football League
as 4:2012cv01296
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Jordan , Randy White , Rayfield Wright and others
Defendant:
The National Football League
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newsom v. Peterkin et al
as 5:2010ct03178
Plaintiff:
Dennis Howard Newsom
Defendant:
Hubert Anthony Peterkin, Gary Hammonds, Hoke County Municipality and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
