Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Stockton v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Wellpath LLC, Bobby Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knode v. Fredrikson et al
as 4:2023cv04171
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dwight Knode
Defendant:
Tracy Fredrikson, Doug Clark, Mark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley Cox v. John Doe 1, et al
as 23-2977
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY M. COX
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, Director of FBI, JASON STEWART and JOSEPH GASS
Gass v. Dergakis et al
as 1:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Nygel Tyler Gass
Defendant:
Jeff Dergakis and Cart Pill Distributer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Cox v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Bradley M Cox
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Jason Stewart and Joseph Gass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Jackson v. Lay et al
as 2:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson and Arkansas Board of Correction
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Michael Richardson, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foley v. Felts et al
as 4:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
John D Foley
Defendant:
John Felts, Benny Mangess, Bobby Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harcey v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2021cv04071
Defendant:
Myron Rau, Kenneth Albers, Chuck Schroyer and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Harcey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
