Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Marrero et al v. City of Brockton et al
as 1:2023cv11117
Plaintiff:
Elynia Marrero and Mikeila Zelia Rosa
Defendant:
City of Brockton and Richard Gaucher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Alperstein et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11033
Plaintiff:
Kwong Cheung Cheung, Chuck Conwell, Naveed Chaundry and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Gaucher v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2017cv01271
Plaintiff:
Nicole Gaucher
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Success Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Compass Bank v. Gaucher
as 5:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Compass Bank
Defendant:
Michel Gaucher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Gaucher
as 1:2014cv00965
Defendant:
Philip E. Gaucher
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Taylor, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different District
Smith et al v. Chapman et al
as 3:2014cv00238
Plaintiff:
Douglas R. Smith, Mary Luczak-Smith, DRS Family Management, LLC and others
Defendant:
Avery Chapman, Taryn Hartnett, Chapman Legal Group doing business as Chapman Law Group, PLLC and others
Petitioner:
Brian Eberhard
Interested Party:
Laboratory Equipment Holdings, LLC and Physicians Choice Laboratory Services, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Chapman Legal Group
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gaucher v. U.S. Bank et al
as 1:2012cv00591
Plaintiff:
David D. Gaucher
Defendant:
U.S. Bank and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1605
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-1511
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
